Stablecoin

A crypto asset that is pegged (see currLency peg) to a real world currency such as the dollar or euro. Stablecoins may be issued on multiple blockchain.

Stablecoins may be leverage against their deposits where the total value in circulation does not equal the assets held on behalf of customers. Such stablecoins are known as unbacked stablecoins.

Since stablecoins are outside the regulatory perimeter, these assets are often used as a place to park winnings from crypto trading to avoid taxation.

See also DeFi, staking and liquidity pool.

References

  1. Steele, Graham. 2021. ‘The Miner of Last Resort: Digital Currency, Shadow Money and the Role of the Central Bank’. Technology and Government, Emerald Studies in Media and Communications, Forthcoming.
  2. Gorton, Gary B., and Jeffery Zhang. 2021. ‘Taming Wildcat Stablecoins’. SSRN Electronic Journal. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3888752.
  3. Bennet, Tomlin. n.d. ‘Tether and Bitfinex Introduction’. Accessed 2 March 2022. https://bennettftomlin.com/2021/08/08/tether-and-bitfinex-introduction/.
  4. Krugman, Paul. 2018. ‘Transaction Costs and Tethers: Why I’m a Crypto Skeptic’. The New York Times 21.
  5. Castor, Amy. 2021. ‘The Curious Case of Tether: A Complete Timeline of Events’. https://amycastor.com/2019/01/17/the-curious-case-of-tether-a-complete-timeline-of-events/.
  6. Griffin, John M, and Amin Shams. 2020. ‘Is Bitcoin Really Untethered?’ The Journal of Finance 75 (4): 1913–64.
  7. Brennecke, Martin, Benjamin Schellinger, Nils Urbach, and Tobias Guggenberger. 2022. ‘The De-Central Bank in Decentralized Finance: A Case Study of MakerDAO’. https://doi.org/10.24251/HICSS.2022.737.
  8. Clements, Ryan. 2021. ‘Built to Fail: The Inherent Fragility of Algorithmic Stablecoins’. SSRN Electronic Journal 11: 131. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3952045.
  9. Ferreira, Agata. 2021. ‘The Curious Case of Stablecoins—Balancing Risks and Rewards?’ Journal of International Economic Law 24 (4): 755–78. https://doi.org/10.1093/jiel/jgab036.
  10. Landwehr, Marvin, and Volker Wulf. 2020. ‘Toward Emancipatory Currencies: A Critique of Facebook’s Libra Cryptocurrency and Ideas for Alternatives’. PervasiveHealth: Pervasive Computing Technologies for Healthcare, 236–46. https://doi.org/10.1145/3401335.3401365.
  11. Li, Ye, and Simon Mayer. 2021. ‘Money Creation in Decentralized Finance: A Dynamic Model of Stablecoin and Crypto Shadow Banking’. Fisher College of Business Working Paper, no. 2020–03: 030.
  12. Malloy, Matthew, and David Lowe. 2021. ‘Global Stablecoins: Monetary Policy Implementation Considerations from the U.S. Perspective’. Finance and Economics Discussion Series 2021 (020): 1–14. https://doi.org/10.17016/feds.2021.020.
  13. Mizrach, Bruce. 2021. ‘Stablecoins: Survivorship, Transactions Costs and Exchange Microstructure’. SSRN Electronic Journal. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3835219.
  14. Pupolizio, Ivan. 2021. ‘From Libra to Diem. The Pursuit of a Global Private Currency’. Global Jurist. https://doi.org/10.1515/gj-2021-0055.
  15. Reiser, Jan. 2020. ‘Libra : An Economic and Technical Analysis’. https://wwz.unibas.ch/fileadmin/user_upload/wwz/00_Professuren/Schaer_DLTFintech/Lehre/Reiser_2020.pdf.
  16. Salmony, Michael. 2019. ‘Money and the Fear of Missing out: How to Stay Sane in a World Shaken by Libra.’ Journal of Payments Strategy & Systems 13 (4): 282–87. https://www.ingentaconnect.com/content/hsp/jpss/2020/00000013/00000004/art00002.
  17. Tischer, Daniel. 2020. ‘Cutting the Network? Facebook’s Libra Currency as a Problem of Organisation’. Finance and Society 6 (1): 19–33. https://doi.org/10.2218/finsoc.v6i1.4406.
  18. Vasudevan, Ramaa. 2020. ‘Libra and Facebook’s Money Illusion’. Challenge 63 (1): 21–39. https://doi.org/10.1080/05775132.2019.1684662.
  19. Zetzsche, Dirk A., Ross P. Buckley, and Douglas W. Arner. 2021. ‘Regulating Libra’. Oxford Journal of Legal Studies 41 (1): 80–113. https://doi.org/10.1093/ojls/gqaa036.
  20. Peebles, Gustav. 2020. ‘Banking on Digital Money: Swedish Cashlessness and the Fraying Currency Tether’. Cultural Anthropology 36 (1): 1–24. https://doi.org/10.14506/ca36.1.01.